Quote:
Originally Posted by britb
Think of it like this:
This year's biology has to be same as last year's biology - you have to qualify for the same second and third year programs. She can't change the laws of chemistry or rewrite how mitosis runs. The content is going to be the same, but with maybe some additions (REAL WORLD EXAMPLE!!!1111).
Ask her like this: "How is the Custom edition an improvement?" or "Professor, what improvements have been made in this custom edition?" And she'll go on and on about how she knows what its like to be a first year and you should study like this.
Oh, I bet the "Applications" boxes are now "REAL WORLD EXAMPLES (c)"
|
Erm...in one of her tests, she decided that chromosomes would move to the middle of the cell AFTER the cell bursts. I was furious...every single resource I looked at had the two steps in the opposite order, but she decided that they happened in that order. Before our class wrote the test, the head TA person tried to tell her how messed up that question was, and how no one would get it right, but she didn't care.
I also wouldn't put it past her to test random details in the textbook, even though she hasn't really done that in the past...after all, she
wrote the textbook.
Or maybe I'm just super-cynical. I am, at the very least, heavily biased