MacInsiders Logo

Similar Threads
Article Article Starter Category Comments Last Post
West Harbour Stadium Vote is Ratified - 10 to 6 Chad MacInsiders Announcements 11 08-15-2010 12:40 PM
Hamilton Stadium: East vs. West aviaf Athletics & Recreation 0 08-10-2010 12:25 PM
Rally to Support West Harbor Stadium Site: August 7th 2010 dsahota MacInsiders Announcements 0 08-05-2010 07:53 PM
Hamilton Pan Am Stadium Chad MacInsiders Announcements 3 07-16-2010 02:47 PM
Bus Routes to Hamilton Harbour marieeeeeee General Discussion 3 11-21-2009 10:10 AM

City Council Backs West Harbour Stadium

 
Via Hamilton Spec:

HAMILTON—Hamilton city council has voted in favour of building a new stadium for the 2015 Pan Am Games at a downtown site.

The vote follows months of negotiations that saw stadium project supporters divided between two sites — downtown’s West Harbour and the East Mountain location favoured by the owner of the Hamilton Tiger-Cats.

City councillor Bob Bratina says the vote, which came after a marathon council meeting, was 12 to 3 in favour of the West Harbour location.

The vote comes on the heels of a bombshell announcement by Tiger-Cats owner Bob Young on Monday that he was withdrawing from negotiations.

An amendment was made before voting that required city council to approach the Tiger-Cats to try to find a solution to the impasse.


Read more
Published by
Chad's Avatar
MacInsiders Founder/Admin
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,121

Article Tools

Deleted Post
Old 08-11-2010 at 05:21 PM   #2
aviaf
Richard Cioci
SRA Member
Posts: 245

Thanked: 46 Times
Liked: 50 Times
W00T. hells yea
 
Old 08-11-2010 at 05:39 PM   #3
aaront
CSD HYPE Web Developer
Posts: 330

Thanked: 29 Times
Liked: 78 Times
Step 1: West Harbour stadium
Step 2: Get TiCats OR another long-term tenant (soccer?)

But it was an important (and surprisingly overwhelming) victory, considering that some of these councilors were on the fence before.
__________________
Software Engineering Class of '11
 
Old 08-11-2010 at 06:30 PM   #4
Kathy2
Elite Member
Posts: 2,112

Thanked: 159 Times
Liked: 529 Times
http://thespec.com/News/Local/article/823818

Does that come off as douchebag-ish to anyone else?

aaront likes this.
 


Old 08-11-2010 at 07:24 PM   #5
aaront
CSD HYPE Web Developer
Posts: 330

Thanked: 29 Times
Liked: 78 Times
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kathy2 View Post
http://thespec.com/News/Local/article/823818

Does that come off as douchebag-ish to anyone else?
Yup.
__________________
Software Engineering Class of '11
 
Old 08-11-2010 at 09:21 PM   #6
Marlowe
Elite Member
Posts: 1,621

Thanked: 195 Times
Liked: 421 Times
Meh, I would have preferred to see Buble as well. Especially since it was clear what the decision would be from pretty early on in the meeting.

So does this mean that we can get rid of the TiCats now?
 
Old 08-11-2010 at 09:24 PM   #7
Shmowen
Absent-Minded Professor
Posts: 294

Thanked: 19 Times
Liked: 141 Times
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaront View Post
Step 1: West Harbour stadium
Step 2: Get TiCats OR another long-term tenant (soccer?)
Agreed! Much more interesting.
__________________
Fightin' the Greek Verb Monster since '09.
 
Old 08-12-2010 at 09:41 AM   #8
drew4008
Member
Posts: 60

Thanked: 2 Times
Liked: 13 Times
What was the point of this vote? The TiCats owner has said in very clear terms he will NOT play at a West Harbour site, no matter what, and nothing is going to change his mind.

All the losers downtown are pissed and I'm loving it... god I hate Hamilton.
 
Old 08-12-2010 at 10:08 AM   #9
J-Met
Elite Member
Posts: 444

Thanked: 62 Times
Liked: 135 Times
I'm calling the the TiCats' bluff. Do they honestly believe Quebec city is going to be a bigger football market than Hamilton, no matter where the stadium is located? Im thankful city council has some cojones and picked West Harbour. Lets just wait for the Ti-Cats to come crawling back.

aaront likes this.
 
Old 08-12-2010 at 12:29 PM   #10
jhan523
Moderator
MacInsiders Staff
Posts: 12,484

Thanked: 1,629 Times
Liked: 604 Times
Quote:
Originally Posted by J-Met View Post
I'm calling the the TiCats' bluff. Do they honestly believe Quebec city is going to be a bigger football market than Hamilton, no matter where the stadium is located? Im thankful city council has some cojones and picked West Harbour. Lets just wait for the Ti-Cats to come crawling back.
I agree, same with the other proposed cities: Moncton, Halifax, Saskatoon...
__________________
Jeremy Han
McMaster Alumni - Honours Molecular Biology and Genetics
Pennsylvania College of Optometry at Salus University Third Year - Doctor of Optometry
 
Old 08-12-2010 at 12:48 PM   #11
SC04
Member
Posts: 29

Thanked: 2 Times
Liked: 4 Times
I hope that the Ti-Cats leave. They brought in heaps of experts and consultants from all over the place to evaluate 10 different sites, and they all expressed how terrible the West Harbour site would be for the team. The site they were fighting for wasn't even their first choice, but the one that an arbitrator advised.

I really don't understand why the city would do this. They're trying to build a stadium for the Pan Am games, but they need federal and provincial funding to do so, and the only way they'll get that is if they have a 'main tenant' (basically the Ti-Cats). If the Ti-Cats do pull out then they'll end up losing the football team which brings a bunch of money into the city, and the games. I know that the city wants to revitalize the downtown, but Copps was meant to do the same, and now it just drains money. Can someone explain this to me?

drew4008, ViktorVaughn like this.
 
Old 08-12-2010 at 01:19 PM   #12
Arslan142
Member
Posts: 8

Thanked: 0 Times
Liked: Liked 2 Times
Quote:
Originally Posted by SC04 View Post
I hope that the Ti-Cats leave. They brought in heaps of experts and consultants from all over the place to evaluate 10 different sites, and they all expressed how terrible the West Harbour site would be for the team. The site they were fighting for wasn't even their first choice, but the one that an arbitrator advised.

I really don't understand why the city would do this. They're trying to build a stadium for the Pan Am games, but they need federal and provincial funding to do so, and the only way they'll get that is if they have a 'main tenant' (basically the Ti-Cats). If the Ti-Cats do pull out then they'll end up losing the football team which brings a bunch of money into the city, and the games. I know that the city wants to revitalize the downtown, but Copps was meant to do the same, and now it just drains money. Can someone explain this to me?
There is nothing to explain. The city council is smoking something real fierce and is making them completely blind to there stupid decisions. The city will lose the Pan Am games if they decide on the West Harbour location. With no future tenant the stadium after the games will never be used. And just drain money to maintain. Federal and Provincial government has already said they will not fund a West Harbour location and the Pan Am officials will not allow the stadium to be made with no future tenant as that was part of the deal. With this requirements to fulfill the East Mountain location is by far the best.

I don't know how many of you are actually from Hamilton. I've been born and raised in Hamilton mostly the west end down the mountain. And I can say the west harbour location is no place for a stadium. Especially a stadium for 18,000+ seats. Not happening. Think of the congestion in the downtown area with no highway access near the stadium site. It would be a complete nightmare and that isn't taking into consideration of where people will park there cars. In front homes?

The city is fighting a losing fight and in the end Hamilton will be left with nothing and the city will continue its downward fall.

drew4008, ViktorVaughn like this.
 
Old 08-12-2010 at 01:51 PM   #13
RyanC
Elite Member
Posts: 5,014

Thanked: 406 Times
Liked: 2,312 Times
I don't support the construction; regardless of where it is built.

Where is the West Harbour location precisely? Is it replacing one of the parks, or that industrial-ish district?

Marlowe likes this.
 
Old 08-12-2010 at 02:29 PM   #14
ViktorVaughn
Senior Member
Posts: 207

Thanked: 26 Times
Liked: 71 Times
Hamilton's politicians are continuously shooting themselves in their own asses. They've been doing this for ages, and the city has continued on its path to self made failure year after year.

The political environment here is very much driven by ego, local and personal motives, and is very unionesque in nature. This decision with the stadium could potentially mean no CFL team, and no federal funding, and a hell of a lot of pissed off voters. For what? Some pathetic attempt to revitalize downtown? Wasn't Copps supposed to do the same thing? Building a bloody stadium in a logistically poor and uninviting area isn't going to help anything, it's just more money down the drain. A stadium doesn't fix social issues or poverty. It does however bring in revenue, if implemented correctly.

This has parallels to the entire spectacle with the the Ontario government's advanced rapid transit system project in the 1980's. The government by way of the UTDC had just developed a new rapid transit light rail system, similar to the C Train in Calgary and Sky Train in Vancouver. It needed a region to pilot the project and offered massive, I believe even complete, funding to Hamilton to be the project's pilot city. Hamilton and its politicians f'ed it up, refused the provinces money, voted against it, and that was that. Hamilton could have had a local rail system similar to a subway today if it were not for this.. forever biting the hand that feeds them.

This nonsense is apparent everywhere. Even in simple matters of zoning and creating an inviting atmosphere for businesses to choose Hamilton as a place to set up shop, or allowing new and attractive residential structures to be erected. A permit process that takes a week elsewhere takes months or years here, and requires one to jump through an uncountable number of hoops and spend an insane amount of money.

Look at how places like Mississauga have grown tremendously since the 80's, and look at how Hamilton has continued to fail, time and time again. It's not that the city is trapped in some sort of inescapable situation, but rather that its government are politics are mindblowingly counterproductive.

I've come to realize that there is no reason to care for Hamilton's success anymore. Let it fail and rot away, it's seemingly what they want. I hate this city.

 
Old 08-12-2010 at 04:10 PM   #15
drew4008
Member
Posts: 60

Thanked: 2 Times
Liked: 13 Times
haha amazing post Viktor, couldn't have said it better, especially the last paragraph.
 



Article Tools Search this Article
Search this Article:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new articles
You may not post comments
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



McMaster University News and Information, Student-run Community, with topics ranging from Student Life, Advice, News, Events, and General Help.
Notice: The views and opinions expressed in this page are strictly those of the student(s) who authored the content. The contents of this page have not been reviewed or approved by McMaster University or the MSU (McMaster Students Union). Being a student-run community, all articles and discussion posts on MacInsiders are unofficial and it is therefore always recommended that you visit the official McMaster website for the most accurate up-to-date information.

Copyright © MacInsiders.com All Rights Reserved. No content can be re-used or re-published without permission. MacInsiders is a service of Fullerton Media Inc. | Created by Chad
Originally Powered by vBulletin®, Copyright © 2019 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved. | Privacy | Terms