I remember that in lecture they gave a good example of an experiment where the person was told to do a boring task, and then told to tell the next subject that the task was really interesting. The subjects were either given 1 dollar or 20 dollars as payment for their tasks.
After this the subjects were asked if they thought the experiment was interesting or not. Which thought the experiment was interesting. Those who got paid a dollar, or those who got paid 20?
The answer is that the people who got paid 1 dollar said the experiment was interesting beucase of the cognative dissonance. They know they lied (action) but do not agreee with the ethics of lying (their thoughts). To align their action and thoughts they agree that the task was interesting.
Those paid 20 dollars can align thought and actions by saying they lied beucase they got paid a significant amount of money-so do not feel compelled to say the task was interesting
Hope that helps
Salima
__________________
Molecular Biology and Genetics Co-op 2013
~*Sara*~
says thanks to salimak for this post.
|