Quote:
Originally Posted by Shmowen
He really only mentions 2 plot holes - the lack of weightlessness in the 3rd dream layer and Fischer not recognizing Saito. The other 3 are actually subtlety explained by the movie (see my other 2 posts above).
But Fischer not recognizing Saito isn't necessarily a plot hole - it could be possible that they have never met (not ALL businessmen know each other). It's just a slight implausibility, not a definitive impossibility. It also seems ridiculous that someone would criticize a movie on such an inconsequential point (it would be like saying "Why aren't the aliens in Avatar green-skinned? They live in a forest....")
He also didn't mention Cobb's lack of a wedding ring as evidence of reality at the end of the movie in his final interpretation of Inception.
|
I don't think Saito was necessarily a businessman. He has the ability to make criminal charges disappear and is trying to stop a monopoly of the world's energy suppliers, which would be pretty horrible. I sort of thought he could easily just be an operator or special agent funded by the United States.
As for the ending, keep in mind that the movie was made to be modeled after a standard heist movie where the gang of thieves get away, like the Italian Job, so if everything appears to work out then it probably did. I think the cliffhanger at the end wasn't meant to be taken that seriously and wasn't necessarily a plot element, but simply the director playing with the moviegoer.
Inception is the millionth interpretation of Plato's Allegory of The Cave and I thought it was fantastic; quite a bit better than The Matrix in my opinion.