01-13-2015 at 12:27 PM
|
#1
|
Account Disabled by User
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 15
Thanked:
1 Time
Liked:
1 Time
|
Math 1AA3 disappointing
While Stewart's book does try to prove things, the professor simply tells us the results to everything without any attempts at mathematical rigor. I've got to ask, why is calculus so dumbed down at Mac? At U of T for example they have Mat 137 (a decent balance between calculations and proofs) as well as Mat 157 (a full-out course on analysis).
|
01-13-2015 at 03:12 PM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 239
Thanked:
8 Times
Liked:
24 Times
|
It must just be the prof or the course itself causing you to feel this way. Speaking from experience, engineering 2nd year term 2 calculus was death. Fucking Gabardo...
|
01-13-2015 at 04:25 PM
|
#3
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,062
Thanked:
505 Times
Liked:
580 Times
|
Who is the prof? When I took it, we did proofs.
It's pretty unfair to generalize your experience in one course with one prof to all calculus at Mac. Also, the author of the textbook is a former Mac prof (he died about a month ago).
|
01-13-2015 at 04:31 PM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 323
Thanked:
68 Times
Liked:
27 Times
|
I'm pretty sure it's just because all our tests are multiple choice anyways and theyre not expecting us to know/understand the proofs so they don't bother teaching it
|
01-13-2015 at 05:53 PM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 165
Thanked:
9 Times
Liked:
23 Times
|
Take 1XX instead.
|
01-13-2015 at 06:29 PM
|
#6
|
Account Disabled by User
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 15
Thanked:
1 Time
Liked:
1 Time
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by starfish
Who is the prof? When I took it, we did proofs.
It's pretty unfair to generalize your experience in one course with one prof to all calculus at Mac. Also, the author of the textbook is a former Mac prof (he died about a month ago).
|
The prof's Andrew Nicas. I'm not badmouthing Stewart, and I already heard that he died in December.
I read ahead in the textbook and just sit around in class while people copy dumb downed notes.
Last edited by Woodplank : 01-13-2015 at 06:34 PM.
|
01-13-2015 at 06:34 PM
|
#7
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,062
Thanked:
505 Times
Liked:
580 Times
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Woodplank
The prof's Andrew Nicas. I'm not badmouthing Stewart, and I already heard that he died in December.
|
I never said you were badmouthing him. Since you seemed to approve of the textbook, I was merely pointing out that the author used to teach math at Mac - it was an example as to why your generalization about calculus being so dumbed down at Mac is false.
|
01-13-2015 at 06:46 PM
|
#8
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 7
Thanked:
0 Times
Liked:
1 Time
|
I've taken 3-4 courses with Nicas and his notes are always very straightforward and simple. His tests are mainly computational as well, but he will include some harder questions that are algebraically rigorous as well as some MC on theorems. His exams are usually harder than the midterms, which are pretty easy. You have to remember that Math 1AA3 is calculus for science students and math courses that provide motivation for topics in real analysis would be Math 1XX3, 2X03, 2XX3. I highly recommend you take advanced calculus next year (it requires Math 1AA3), but it's mainly computational as well. If you're looking for a challenge, then take Math 1C03 (Introduction to Mathematical Reasoning) with Haskell. It's offered this term and still open.
|
01-13-2015 at 09:49 PM
|
#9
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 405
Thanked:
36 Times
Liked:
158 Times
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Dream
It must just be the prof or the course itself causing you to feel this way. Speaking from experience, engineering 2nd year term 2 calculus was death. Fucking Gabardo...
|
We do not speak his name.
__________________
Electrical Engineering '13
|
01-14-2015 at 07:28 AM
|
#10
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 239
Thanked:
8 Times
Liked:
24 Times
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Imperious
I'm pretty sure it's just because all our tests are multiple choice anyways and theyre not expecting us to know/understand the proofs so they don't bother teaching it
|
Just because tests are multiple choice, doesnt mean you arent expected to know/understand the proofs. How do you think you get to the correct answer of a multiple choice question (aside from guessing) without performing the proof/calculations?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bhaltair
We do not speak his name.
|
LMAO this is some He Who Must Not Be Named shit right here!
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
McMaster University News and Information, Student-run Community, with topics ranging from Student Life, Advice, News, Events, and General Help.
Notice: The views and opinions expressed in this page are strictly those of the student(s) who authored the content. The contents of this page have not been reviewed or approved by McMaster University or the MSU (McMaster Students Union). Being a student-run community, all articles and discussion posts on MacInsiders are unofficial and it is therefore always recommended that you visit the official McMaster website for the most accurate up-to-date information.
|