Quote:
Originally Posted by strawbrryjam
currently i have three math this year, and i'm wondering if it is too much math.
so, if i were to compare these two courses, which one is more "birdy"?
|
Math 1B03
can be very easy, if you don't really concern yourself with the meaning behind the material. Many concepts in the course are actually pretty complicated, but you don't really need to know the concepts and their bases (no, not a 1B03 pun) to do well in the course.
However, this means that there's always the "risk" of a professor that takes a more rigorous approach to the material and tests you on more than 'compute this, compute that'. This would make the course a whole lot more interesting if you care for the material (if you like math, you should, since a lot of the material is fundamental to much of mathematics) but also a whole lot more difficult to do well in via the process of rote learning.
Music 1AA3 is, from experience, very, very easy, and I don't see how they could make it more challenging without having some sort of 'music theory background' requisite. That being said, I listened to the genres of classical music covered by the course (Baroque, Romantic, 20th century, jazz) before the course, and found that the assessment portion of the course (identifying pieces) took away from actually listening to pieces for fun - everything is less enjoyable when you have to 'memorize' it for a test...