MacInsiders Logo

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Physics 1B03 CAPA #1 tatski-p Academics 3 01-13-2011 09:35 PM
PHYSICS 1B03- Question regarding CAPA ShesTheMan Academics 13 01-12-2011 01:32 PM
Physics 1b03 capa Jamalf Academics 4 09-16-2010 08:02 PM
Why don't Physics 1B03/Bio 1B03 have any tutorials listed on Master Timetable :| ? m0nica First-Year / Prospective Student Questions 12 07-12-2010 10:00 AM
Help With Physics 1E03 CAPA ! Bobert Academics 2 01-10-2009 11:55 AM

Physics 1B03 Capa Help

 
Old 03-03-2011 at 03:33 PM   #1
ShesTheMan
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 188

Thanked: 0 Times
Liked: 0 Times




Physics 1B03 Capa Help
Hey!

Is there anyone taking physics 1B03 that has completed the CAPA assignment due tonight?
I've got just 3 questions left.. (3 parts to the same q) and I can't seem to understand why my method of approach is wrong.
If there's someone that could help me out, please message me! Thank you
Old 03-03-2011 at 03:36 PM   #2
REPLEKIA/.
Community Engagement Officer
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,195

Thanked: 105 Times
Liked: 447 Times




You could always post the questions and those of us here who know how to solve the problem who are not in physics 1b03, yet still know physics, could run you through how to solve it without giving you a final answer (as that would probably constitute academic dishonesty)
Old 03-03-2011 at 03:39 PM   #3
ShesTheMan
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 188

Thanked: 0 Times
Liked: 0 Times




Alright, here's the question:

A broken clothes drier with a mass of 121 kg is hurled from a cliff 13.9 m high with an initial velocity of 13.4 m/s, directed at an angle of 39.8° above the horizontal. How much work is done on the drier by its own weight during its fall from the cliff to the ground? What change in the gravitational potential energy of the clothes drier takes place during the fall? If the gravitational potential energy at the top of the cliff is assumed to be zero, what is its value when the clothes drier crashes into the ground?

And yes, I don't want someone to give me the final answers. I'd like if someone can work me through the problem so I could see where I went wrong and derive the answers on my own.
Old 03-03-2011 at 03:47 PM   #4
REPLEKIA/.
Community Engagement Officer
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,195

Thanked: 105 Times
Liked: 447 Times




Lemme see if I can remember how to do this from my grade 12 physics (which covered more than 1L03 has covered thus far...)

#1) Work=force*distance Since it says work done by weight does it not only consider the y axis? (13.9m) If that's wrong you probably have to consider how high above the trajectory the throw puts the drier above the cliff and add it to the 13.9 m.

#2 & #3)
for 3 split (delta)Ep into Ep(cliff)-Ep(ground) where Ep(cliff)=0 J

Last edited by REPLEKIA/. : 03-03-2011 at 03:54 PM.
Old 03-03-2011 at 03:51 PM   #5
jhan523
Moderator
MacInsiders Staff
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 12,484

Thanked: 1,629 Times
Liked: 604 Times




Quote:
Originally Posted by ShesTheMan View Post
Alright, here's the question:

A broken clothes drier with a mass of 121 kg is hurled from a cliff 13.9 m high with an initial velocity of 13.4 m/s, directed at an angle of 39.8° above the horizontal. How much work is done on the drier by its own weight during its fall from the cliff to the ground? What change in the gravitational potential energy of the clothes drier takes place during the fall? If the gravitational potential energy at the top of the cliff is assumed to be zero, what is its value when the clothes drier crashes into the ground?

And yes, I don't want someone to give me the final answers. I'd like if someone can work me through the problem so I could see where I went wrong and derive the answers on my own.
A) Remember, Work = Force * Distance. So, what's the Force exerted on the drier as it's falling and what was the distance covered from the moment the drier was hurled? Remember, it's fall from the cliff to the ground also includes the upward distance the drier travelled.

B) I don't really know what it's asking for... The ambiguity of the question makes me think it's just asking if the change in gravitational potential is positive or negative... However it could also mean, what is the biggest change in energy.

C) This is just using another formula, which is the gravitation potential energy. It's been a while, but I think it's mgh.
__________________
Jeremy Han
McMaster Alumni - Honours Molecular Biology and Genetics
Pennsylvania College of Optometry at Salus University Third Year - Doctor of Optometry
Old 03-03-2011 at 03:55 PM   #6
REPLEKIA/.
Community Engagement Officer
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,195

Thanked: 105 Times
Liked: 447 Times




Unrelated: Clothes driers are recyclable, do not throw them off cliffs. THIS IS A BAD THING TO DO.

Chevalier likes this.
Old 03-03-2011 at 03:56 PM   #7
ShesTheMan
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 188

Thanked: 0 Times
Liked: 0 Times




For #1, I calculated the additional distance it travels upwards and multiplied it by mg because its asking for the work done by the weight. But that's the same thing has potential gravitational energy and apparently, that's incorrect.
Old 03-03-2011 at 03:59 PM   #8
REPLEKIA/.
Community Engagement Officer
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,195

Thanked: 105 Times
Liked: 447 Times




Quote:
Originally Posted by ShesTheMan View Post
For #1, I calculated the additional distance it travels upwards and multiplied it by mg because its asking for the work done by the weight. But that's the same thing has potential gravitational energy and apparently, that's incorrect.
Wait, did you just multiply only the upwards distance by mg? Shouldn't it be (upwards distance+13.9 m)*mg?
Old 03-03-2011 at 04:00 PM   #9
jhan523
Moderator
MacInsiders Staff
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 12,484

Thanked: 1,629 Times
Liked: 604 Times




Quote:
Originally Posted by REPLEKIA/. View Post
Wait, did you just multiply only the upwards distance by mg? Shouldn't it be (upwards distance+13.9 m)*mg?
I believe it should actually be (2*(Upwards Distance)+13.9)*mg...
__________________
Jeremy Han
McMaster Alumni - Honours Molecular Biology and Genetics
Pennsylvania College of Optometry at Salus University Third Year - Doctor of Optometry
Old 03-03-2011 at 04:01 PM   #10
ShesTheMan
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 188

Thanked: 0 Times
Liked: 0 Times




Noo. my bad.
I calculated the additional distance it travelled upwards, added that to the 13.9 and then multiplied the entire distance by mg
And it's still wrong :(

Maybe my calculations were wrong? Is someone would like to double check.

I did (13.4sin39.8)^2 / (2*9.81) = 3.75 m (the additional distance it travelled upwards)
and then W =mgd = (121)(9.81)(3.75+13.9 ) = 20950 J

Last edited by ShesTheMan : 03-03-2011 at 04:06 PM.
Old 03-03-2011 at 04:07 PM   #11
ShesTheMan
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 188

Thanked: 0 Times
Liked: 0 Times




Quote:
Originally Posted by jhan523 View Post
I believe it should actually be (2*(Upwards Distance)+13.9)*mg...
Sorry I'm having trouble understanding... why would it be 2*upwards distance?
Old 03-03-2011 at 04:08 PM   #12
REPLEKIA/.
Community Engagement Officer
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,195

Thanked: 105 Times
Liked: 447 Times




Quote:
Originally Posted by Physics forum elsewhere on the internet
The concept of work arises only when there is a force acting on a body. In case of a projectile no force acts in the X direction as the X component of velocity remains constant. But the force of gravity acts in the Y direction. therefore work would be mg*(component of displacement in the Y direction of the projectile).
Therefore work should be 121 kg*9.8 m/s^2*13.9 m

If that doesn't work than maybe CAPA is getting mad over how you enter the answer.

Last edited by REPLEKIA/. : 03-03-2011 at 04:10 PM.
Old 03-03-2011 at 04:13 PM   #13
ShesTheMan
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 188

Thanked: 0 Times
Liked: 0 Times




^ No, that worked.
Thanks a lot!
Old 03-03-2011 at 04:14 PM   #14
jhan523
Moderator
MacInsiders Staff
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 12,484

Thanked: 1,629 Times
Liked: 604 Times




Quote:
Originally Posted by ShesTheMan View Post
Sorry I'm having trouble understanding... why would it be 2*upwards distance?
Oh ok, sorry about that. Work is not Force*Distance, it's Force*Displacement >.<
__________________
Jeremy Han
McMaster Alumni - Honours Molecular Biology and Genetics
Pennsylvania College of Optometry at Salus University Third Year - Doctor of Optometry
Old 03-03-2011 at 06:05 PM   #15
Scuderia
RocketSaurus
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 330

Thanked: 16 Times
Liked: 110 Times




Quote:
Originally Posted by ShesTheMan View Post
^ No, that worked.
Thanks a lot!
did you get B and C as well?

How did you work those out?



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



McMaster University News and Information, Student-run Community, with topics ranging from Student Life, Advice, News, Events, and General Help.
Notice: The views and opinions expressed in this page are strictly those of the student(s) who authored the content. The contents of this page have not been reviewed or approved by McMaster University or the MSU (McMaster Students Union). Being a student-run community, all articles and discussion posts on MacInsiders are unofficial and it is therefore always recommended that you visit the official McMaster website for the most accurate up-to-date information.

Copyright © MacInsiders.com All Rights Reserved. No content can be re-used or re-published without permission. MacInsiders is a service of Fullerton Media Inc. | Created by Chad
Originally Powered by vBulletin®, Copyright © 2019 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved. | Privacy | Terms