MacInsiders Logo

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Royal wedding.. guest_295 General Discussion 25 04-14-2011 11:16 AM
Doc Royal macoutsider Drink Mixes 0 06-22-2008 02:55 AM
royal botanical garden & canadian warplane heritage museum ayinaim General Discussion 8 12-17-2007 02:34 AM

Royal wedding !!!

 
Old 04-29-2011 at 02:42 PM   #31
Faer
Elite Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,172

Thanked: 89 Times
Liked: 338 Times




Quote:
Originally Posted by lizziepizzie View Post
I didn;t think they looked nervous at all! I think they handled it quite well. And, yeah, apparently she was sent to St. Andrew's by her parents specifically to meet William and date him.
They handled it magnificently, but they were definitely jittery! I can't list out all the things which made me think so, but it was obvious they were relieved when the ceremony was more than half-way done.

It was such fun to watch...all royal pomp and flair...LOL.
Old 04-29-2011 at 03:44 PM   #32
Icecream
Account Locked
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 398

Thanked: 7 Times
Liked: 42 Times




Quote:
Originally Posted by BeAll_EndAll View Post
Who the hell is American here?

As Canada is a commonwealth realm, at least give a small shit
I wasn't referring to anyone here just to all the Americans hyped up about this wedding.

If Canada was to be loyal to the royal crown, we should be loyal to the true heir of the throne.
Why did Victoria the Queen married Albert a descendant of a German Dynasty. And because of that, technically, they named the royal house a German name until 1910s where the King changed it to house of Windsor. Victoria was English, but her husband was German and so was the lineage due to y-chromosone dna lineage.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaryll View Post
Clearly you guys have no idea how much money the royal family brings in for the country in terms of foreign tourism.
Clearly, you have no idea how much brits taxmoney goes to royalty.
Old 04-29-2011 at 03:59 PM   #33
doppelganger
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 235

Thanked: 19 Times
Liked: 65 Times




Quote:
Originally Posted by Icecream View Post
Clearly, you have no idea how much brits taxmoney goes to royalty.

The BBC reports that the annual cost of the royals to the British public is around £41.5 M. Since the pop. of Britain is around 62 M, that comes out to be less than one pound per person.
Unnecessary? Maybe. Expensive? Not really.
Old 04-29-2011 at 04:01 PM   #34
Cliu91
Taylor Gang Lifestyle
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 731

Thanked: 65 Times
Liked: 325 Times




I think it's a tradition more than anything.
You can't exactly get rid of them in today's society, and they don't hold any real power.
Old 04-29-2011 at 04:36 PM   #35
ShouldBeStudying
Elite Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 629

Thanked: 29 Times
Liked: 357 Times




I wonder if their divorce is going to be as extravagant.

Revolution1, siefer1322 like this.
Old 04-29-2011 at 04:40 PM   #36
lizziepizzie
aka Mrs. Henry Cavill
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,830

Thanked: 103 Times
Liked: 423 Times




Quote:
Originally Posted by Cliu91 View Post
I think it's a tradition more than anything.
You can't exactly get rid of them in today's society, and they don't hold any real power.
Queen is Elizabeth is still in power of the church of England. And, yes, she definitely has power over England joined with the Prime Minister.
__________________
Old 04-29-2011 at 05:08 PM   #37
Faer
Elite Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,172

Thanked: 89 Times
Liked: 338 Times




Quote:
Originally Posted by ShouldBeStudying View Post
I wonder if their divorce is going to be as extravagant.
Oh, come ON. They just got married!

At least let them live a few years of it out before begining the speculations....
Old 04-29-2011 at 05:16 PM   #38
Amaryll
My math prof is hotter.
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 531

Thanked: 56 Times
Liked: 326 Times




Quote:
Originally Posted by Icecream View Post
Clearly, you have no idea how much brits taxmoney goes to royalty.
Hugely, significantly less than what they bring in for tourism. As for this wedding, it was paid privately by them and has resulted in a huge increase in numbers of foreign tourists. Your point?

Last edited by Amaryll : 04-29-2011 at 06:19 PM.
Old 04-29-2011 at 05:20 PM   #39
Icecream
Account Locked
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 398

Thanked: 7 Times
Liked: 42 Times




Quote:
Originally Posted by doppelganger View Post
The BBC reports that the annual cost of the royals to the British public is around £41.5 M. Since the pop. of Britain is around 62 M, that comes out to be less than one pound per person.
Unnecessary? Maybe. Expensive? Not really.
Umm, that's not how taxes work.... You don't take the amount of money and divided by the amount of people....

Because, NOT everyone pays taxes. And, not everyone (disabled, married...) pays the same amount. There is income tax, corporation taxes and so on.

It is ridiculous for 2 billion people (as reported by almost every news channel) watched this crap for 1 to 6 hours. Brings people together ? Yes but temporarily. Helps tourism ? Sure.

But if 2 billion people watched videos about aids, cancer, war-torn countries, WAR, listened to politics, watched parliament debates of their countries, or just the damn news about events that mattered for ONE hour. Than most problems would have been fixed.

Seriously, if aliens came and asked me to pinpoint on a map all the populated cities (even if they can find them without my help) so they can obliterate them, I will gladly help.

Last edited by Icecream : 04-29-2011 at 05:27 PM.

Old 04-29-2011 at 05:22 PM   #40
Amaryll
My math prof is hotter.
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 531

Thanked: 56 Times
Liked: 326 Times




Quote:
Originally Posted by Icecream View Post
Umm, that's not how taxes work.... You don't take the amount of money and divided by the amount of people....

Because, NOT everyone pays taxes. And, not everyone (disabled, married...) pays the same amount. There is income tax, corporation taxes and so on.
Not that this is particularly significant, but it's about £1.33 per taxpayer.
Old 04-29-2011 at 05:38 PM   #41
_Luu_
Elite Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 536

Thanked: 35 Times
Liked: 184 Times




Quote:
Originally Posted by doppelganger View Post
The BBC reports that the annual cost of the royals to the British public is around £41.5 M...
But that's the British contribution to it. What about Commonwealth nations? Don't they also have to pitch in some cash as well?
__________________
Andrew Luu
Medical Radiation Sciences '14 (Radiation Therapy)
NIL SATIS NISI OPTIMUM
Old 04-29-2011 at 05:43 PM   #42
ShouldBeStudying
Elite Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 629

Thanked: 29 Times
Liked: 357 Times




Quote:
Originally Posted by Icecream View Post

It is ridiculous for 2 billion people (as reported by almost every news channel) watched this crap for 1 to 6 hours. Brings people together ? Yes but temporarily. Helps tourism ? Sure.
That number sounds a little high...but then again people are dumb dumb dumb.

siefer1322 likes this.
Old 04-29-2011 at 07:42 PM   #43
anon491
Professional Fangirl
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,167

Thanked: 135 Times
Liked: 452 Times




My own opinion of "commoners" is that they're not uber-rich millionaires. That kind of defeats the purpose of being "common", doesn't it? The fact that they are judging kate by her bloodline and not by her economic status disqualifies this as a "Fairytale prince & pauper romance", imo. but then again, I have pretty far-fetched and unmatchable expectations lolol.

Last edited by anon491 : 04-29-2011 at 07:53 PM.
Old 04-29-2011 at 08:39 PM   #44
AelyaS
Fitzgerald groupie
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,308

Thanked: 74 Times
Liked: 521 Times




Quote:
Originally Posted by Faer View Post
Oh, come ON. They just got married!

At least let them live a few years of it out before begining the speculations....


He has a point. Didn't all eight or so marriages between princes and their brides before Will+Kate end in divorce?

Whatever.

He needs a toupée.
__________________
Honours English and History III
Not a hipster
Old 04-29-2011 at 09:09 PM   #45
Faer
Elite Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,172

Thanked: 89 Times
Liked: 338 Times




Quote:
Originally Posted by AelyaS View Post
He has a point. Didn't all eight or so marriages between princes and their brides before Will+Kate end in divorce?
Never said he wasn't right, just hope he is wrong. Which eight or so marriages, btw? Just out of curiousity? Queen Liz II is still going strong...but that's about all I can remember.

EDIT: Oh, those eight or so marriages (Just saw). Imagining Charles and Diana taking the same vows as William and Kate is so ironic.

Last edited by Faer : 04-30-2011 at 12:10 AM.



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



McMaster University News and Information, Student-run Community, with topics ranging from Student Life, Advice, News, Events, and General Help.
Notice: The views and opinions expressed in this page are strictly those of the student(s) who authored the content. The contents of this page have not been reviewed or approved by McMaster University or the MSU (McMaster Students Union). Being a student-run community, all articles and discussion posts on MacInsiders are unofficial and it is therefore always recommended that you visit the official McMaster website for the most accurate up-to-date information.

Copyright © MacInsiders.com All Rights Reserved. No content can be re-used or re-published without permission. MacInsiders is a service of Fullerton Media Inc. | Created by Chad
Originally Powered by vBulletin®, Copyright © 2019 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved. | Privacy | Terms