MacInsiders Logo

Similar Threads
Review Review Starter Category Comments Last Post
Kin 3SS3 mitch 3rd Year Course Reviews 21 03-14-2015 04:34 AM
Kinesiology 3ss3 - Body, Mind, Spirit Goce Academics 2 08-11-2010 11:36 PM
Hth Sci 3i03, 3k03, Kin 3ss3 jordan19 Academics 0 07-18-2010 08:48 PM
Dropping Kin 3y03, 3ss3, biochem 3n03 kammy435 Academics 0 06-11-2010 11:49 AM
Bio 3SS3 Format melchizedek Academics 0 01-11-2010 03:37 PM

Biology 3SS3

 
Old 06-12-2009 at 08:13 AM   #16
Lois
Elite Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,069

Thanked: 318 Times
Liked: 361 Times




Biology 3SS3
**note: I took the course with Dudley, not Rollo**

The course itself was fairly interesting if you enjoy biodiversity and the environment. Make sure you know the articles very thoroughly - most of them are interesting (especially at the end).

10% Quiz - mostly based on...

says thanks to Lois for this post.
Old 05-01-2011 at 04:06 PM   #15
Mahratta
Elite Member
Posts: 974

Thanked: 89 Times
Liked: 366 Times
I took this course with Dr. Dushoff. I enjoyed it, since I'm a mathematics student with an interest in evolutionary ecology, and this course was taught by a math-heavy professor in biology.

We covered a set of mathematical models that describe various ecological phenomena in time. None of the models were covered in particularly much detail. Mathematical biology of this sort involves a great deal of differential equations, but there was no mathematics prerequisite for the course - thus, we ended up studying very simple, qualitatively described systems.

Dr. Dushoff did seem to confuse himself quite often, and I think I know why - when people pose questions in biological terms and ask about graphs qualitatively, it's difficult to translate into quantitative mathematical terms and then translate back effectively. Of course, most of the class didn't have a mathematical background, and thus asked questions about fundamentally mathematical ideas in biological terms, which ended up being confusing for everyone.

I'd highly recommend the course to anyone who has taken math 1A03 and 1AA3, or has seen a little bit of differential equations. Otherwise, the course won't mean much beyond the memorization of a few graphs and concepts (hey, that's what biology seems to be anyway, right? (; ).

We had a couple of assignments worth 10% in total. They involved the use of R, and were generally very easy. Dr. Dushoff wrote all the code, we just had to plug in numbers for the variables, make a couple of simple qualitative descriptions, print out the graphs and...free marks!

The tests (midterms and final) were very easy. However, I was generally surprised to find that the bulk of the class could recite definitions in the review sessions (far better than I could ever dream of doing) but fared quite poorly on the tests. This is because there's very few concepts we need to know, and they're quite simple. The tests involve application of these concepts, and so we really need to know why and how we would use the ideas.

Generally, if you've done well in 'thinking' courses like mathematics, philosophy, or physics, (or if you enjoy the dynamics of ecological systems, of course!) then you should find this course a breeze.
__________________


Last edited by Mahratta : 05-01-2011 at 04:12 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2011 at 05:22 PM   #16
harpell09
Member
Posts: 1

Thanked: 0 Times
Liked: 0 Times
I took it this past winter (2011) with Dr. Dushoff. You can't help but love him, but I would definitely agree that he gets really flustered and can't remember what he just said half the time so it's hard to get a clear answer. I think that the general concepts were fairly straight forward and simple, and the math was really more theoretical that was linked to a written explanation of the concept so if your not good at math (like me) I didn't really find it to be a problem. The two midterms were super easy with just simple and straight forward multiple choice and 1 short answer, but I found that the final was considerably harder. The assignments did not really have anything to do with lecture and your mark really depended on how well you were able to understand the online instructions explaining how to use the computor program that you had to download to make graphs.
Overall I got a really good mark, but it definitely was not my favourite class and lectures were dry on occassion.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2011 at 08:53 PM   #17
guptas46
Member
Posts: 46

Thanked: 4 Times
Liked: 9 Times
Hey, are the tutorials for this course mandatory?
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2011 at 11:09 AM   #18
sivakuvt
Member
Posts: 16

Thanked: 0 Times
Liked: 0 Times
Doesn't require a lot of math skills. Just go to tutorials and you'll be fine. Overall pretty easy course.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2011 at 12:11 PM   #19
petitjcl
Member
Posts: 11

Thanked: 0 Times
Liked: 0 Times
Im taking this course next term, and I found that I didnt really like his teaching style and Im kind of afraid of the math everyone said in the course. What kind of math can there be?
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2012 at 09:15 AM   #20
hons2
Member
Posts: 44

Thanked: 0 Times
Liked: 1 Time
does this course rely heavily on evolution at all?
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2012 at 11:56 AM   #21
nita
Member
Posts: 46

Thanked: Thanked 2 Times
Liked: 3 Times
not at all focused on evolution
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2012 at 07:10 PM   #22
karna
Senior Member
Posts: 232

Thanked: 31 Times
Liked: 28 Times
easy course but boring content. fell every single lecture

Last edited by karna : 06-01-2012 at 10:47 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2012 at 01:53 PM   #23
Mahratta
Elite Member
Posts: 974

Thanked: 89 Times
Liked: 366 Times
Quote:
Originally Posted by petitjcl View Post
Im taking this course next term, and I found that I didnt really like his teaching style and Im kind of afraid of the math everyone said in the course. What kind of math can there be?
The math you will actually have to use to get through the course is nothing to worry about at all. Rearranging equations and so on. There is a lot of math (both explicitly and in coding intuition) in the course if you care to look for it-- for example, he gives us code in R and makes us do the pointless work of plugging values in -- but we could mess around with the code itself and see what happens. The way Dushoff teaches it suits a more mathematical style, but you can get other things out of lecturing too. Plus, he goes really slow.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2013 at 02:28 PM   #24
derp
Member
Posts: 9

Thanked: 0 Times
Liked: 0 Times
Has anyone had Bolker as a prof in other courses before? Bolker is teaching this course next year.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2013 at 05:07 PM   #25
derp
Member
Posts: 9

Thanked: 0 Times
Liked: 0 Times
Could anyone give an updated review of this course? Thanks!
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2013 at 03:53 AM   #26
danielw
Member
Posts: 10

Thanked: 2 Times
Liked: 0 Times
2 tests, like 3 tutorial assignments.

tests pretty basic, cover lecture material
tutorial assignments were free marks. drew some graphs and were spoon fed how to use R. basic math equations (all the formulas are in the lecture notes you just need to know what's what..)
exam just a longer midterm

i didn't do amazing in the course because the content actually made me lose consciousness but I think if you can manage to stay awake you will do very well.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2013 at 12:01 AM   #27
Silver
Elite Member
Posts: 1,511

Thanked: 193 Times
Liked: 392 Times
has bolker taught this before
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2013 at 12:13 AM   #28
~*Sara*~
Moderator
MacInsiders Staff
Posts: 7,303

Thanked: 819 Times
Liked: 622 Times
Quote:
Originally Posted by Silver View Post
has bolker taught this before
I don't think so. At least not in the last 5 years.
__________________
Mary Keyes CA 2013-2014
Hons. Biology and Pharmacology V
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2014 at 03:09 AM   #29
Swampis
Senior Member
Posts: 286

Thanked: 75 Times
Liked: 39 Times
I initially took this course thinking it would an easy upper course. However, the first midterm did not go so well, many people did not as well as they expected and thus the prof had to curve the first midterm. IMO, the first midterm was difficult especially the short answer section. The second midterm was make easier and doable, the I assume the average on this midterm was quite high. The difficultly of exam was in between the the two midterms and all multiple choice. The assignments were easy to get 90+ on, and there was 2% bonus for attending classes. I found the content to be boring and skipped most lectures after the first midterm. It is however doable to get double digits in this class. I do recommend this course for upper level science students.

SaugaCity says thanks to Swampis for this post.
  Reply With Quote



Review Tools Search this Review
Search this Review:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new reviews
You may not post comments
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



McMaster University News and Information, Student-run Community, with topics ranging from Student Life, Advice, News, Events, and General Help.
Notice: The views and opinions expressed in this page are strictly those of the student(s) who authored the content. The contents of this page have not been reviewed or approved by McMaster University or the MSU (McMaster Students Union). Being a student-run community, all articles and discussion posts on MacInsiders are unofficial and it is therefore always recommended that you visit the official McMaster website for the most accurate up-to-date information.

Copyright © MacInsiders.com All Rights Reserved. No content can be re-used or re-published without permission. MacInsiders is a service of Fullerton Media Inc. | Created by Chad
Originally Powered by vBulletin®, Copyright © 2019 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved. | Privacy | Terms