Quote:
Originally Posted by ONasri15
Google Fiber is good in theory but isn't very practical. Most wifi routers are capped to 300Mbps. Also, unless you have a SSD your harddrive won't be able to keep up with Fiber's download speed and will create a bottleneck. Also 95% of wifi adapters in laptops/desktops these days are also limited under 1Gbps.
|
It's only "up to" 1 Gbps. I highly doubt most people will be getting that speed. As far as I know though, there is some wireless standard in development to supersede 802.11N, so potentially we'll be getting wifi that is that fast some point in the future. Also, gigabit LAN equipment currently exists, so there is an obvious demand for it. Most hard drives are capable of ~70 MB/s read/write which translates to 560 Mb/s, and SSDs go beyond that. Web stuff is more RAM intensive anyway, which obviously goes faster than 1 Gb/s in any modern machine. Most servers sending information will be using massive high speed RAIDs anyway.
Aside from that, I think Google is getting a little carried away with themselves here - I very highly doubt that we'll be getting fibre lines directly to our houses when not even all corporations can afford such things to their business sites. I also don't see how they're just going to somehow have the go-ahead to install fibre-lines throughout neighborhoods either.
I can see this being setup somewhere like Topeka (where they test drive all their shit), but never making it out of Kansas. Remember Google's initiative to create their own power grid?
The ISPs out there aren't just going to give up their territory to Google without trying to throw some legislation against them.
For the time being, I remain skeptical...