I can only speak for the first two.
3B03 is an okay class, you're right, they put together cytoskeleton and nucleus in to one class. Last year was the first year they offered it. There was 2 midterms, 2 quizzes (if i remember correctly), 1 group (3 ppl) presentation on an article and a critique of an article. In terms of difficulty, it definitely isn't an easy class but it's not brutal. Dr. Gupta's test was pretty rough and from what I heard everyone had trouble with it in the class. Dr. Daniel's test was better, I'm not sure if she made it a bit easier because Dr. Gupta's test was hard but she made sure we knew what to expect, no surprises, so we were able to study well for it. The presentation was simple, easy marks. The critique on the other hand was pretty hard to do overall but marks were good for it. The exam was also a little rough. On the exam there were experimental application questions, so they give a problem and you have to design an experiment. So on that note I would recommend this class because it is useful material and both profs are very nice buuuut it's not easy. Dr. Daniel I feel is very invested in her students and she's nice in the sense that she wants to help everyone be aware of all their options concerning careers in science and stuff. Also don't compare this class to 2nd year cell bio, it's very different and more difficult. It's way more specific (obviously since it's only on the nucleus and cytoskeleton)
Now 3O03
Dr. Elliot is actually the nicest person ever. She's a really good professor, makes sure everyone understands, is very approachable and is very passionate about her work...BUT this class was really hard for me. A lot harder then 3B03 and if I could go back in time I would not take it, I'm not sure why I did. It's not the same as Bio 2EE3 but some parts are a little bit similar when it comes to some things about microbes so if you really enjoyed 2EE3 then I say you should consider it. There was a midterm, quizzes, research paper summary, research paper presentation and exam. The presentation was very similar to the one in 3B03. For the summary, everyone I talked to did really poorly, I'm not sure what the TAs were looking for. The summary is like a written version of the presentation and not worth much but it can bring your presentation mark down. The testing was difficult. It was all making up experiments, very application based. Because I didn't get a very good understanding from the material I had a hard time applying things on the tests.
gggggg
says thanks to lt93 for this post.
|