Raid vs Single drive performance
I was having a discussion on raid performance at one of our LAN parties and promised to post pics from my setup, so here they are...
single Western Digital 250gb sata drive (cheap)
vs
dual Western Digital 250gb sata drives in Raid-0 (striped) (still cheap)
So, as you are about to see, the performance gain is almost 100% improvement. Of course, if one hard drive fails, the array crashes... so may sure to save disk images (Acronis True Image, Norton Ghost, etc) once a month to a secondary disk (recommend non raided in case of mobo failure).. for this i have another WD 640 gb hard drive.
So, ideally you set windows to be the first partition (20 GB in size), so you have fastest area of disk, and small partition to backup.
Then create other partitions for slower data (music, etc). The extra read and write speeds are particularly handy when transferring loads of data between hard drives and for video editing.
-Kevin
edit: my raid of 2 drives is less then ideal, i had an older revision of the 250 gb / 16mb cache from a few years ago and i raided that with a new 250 gb / 16mb cache blue edition that i purchased recently to raid with it...they have different speeds unfortunately....iden tical drives is best!
__________________
Interested in computer gaming over LAN ? Visit http://www.maclanclub.com and sign up for mailing list, we host LAN Parties every month!
Last edited by kevinf : 02-09-2010 at 09:50 PM.
|