MacInsiders Logo

Similar Threads
Article Article Starter Category Comments Last Post
The Effects of Caffeine on the Body ksterne Food & Meal Plans 41 09-25-2010 05:14 PM
Body Image Issues Anonymouse Body & Food 8 09-13-2010 09:15 PM
Parking violation... Serene Automotive & Transportation 5 07-15-2010 09:06 PM
Body Art Series Pt1: Tattoos kokosas Misc 8 06-30-2008 09:18 AM

Full Body Scanners: Necessity or Violation of Privacy?

 
For those unaware of the present situation, The Transport Security Administration (TSA) has implemented full body scans at numerous major United States airports in an attempt to make air travel more secure. These scans show an essentially naked picture of the person being scanned. Below is an officially released scan by the TSA. It shows how concealed weaponry is made visible with the body scanners.



People who opt out of getting the scans are instead subjected to a pat-down or possibly even a strip search. This applies even to young children, who receive a 'modified' pat-down.

This leaves you with the option of being viewed near naked or being touched in ways most people are uncomfortable with by a TSA official, all in the name of safety. As one might expect, there are a large contingent of people strongly opposed to both options who feel that their rights are being encroached on. Another group of people

It should be noted that full body scans and pat-downs is not isolated solely to the USA. Toronto Pearson Internal and Vancouver International have also implemented the same procedures, and it is likely that many other major Canadian airports will adopt them as well soon.

What's your take on this MacInsiders? Are body scanners a necessity to ensure the
safety of a country's citizens or are they a means high-tech voyeurism that encroaches on our rights?
Published by
REPLEKIA/.'s Avatar
Community Engagement Officer
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,195

Article Tools

Deleted Post
Old 11-25-2010 at 07:33 PM   #2
xxsumz
Radiates Awesomeness
Posts: 1,598

Thanked: 88 Times
Liked: 333 Times
If it stops the terrorists, im all up for it.
__________________
o.O
 
Old 11-25-2010 at 07:39 PM   #3
lawleypop
I am Prince Vegeta.
Posts: 4,770

Thanked: 224 Times
Liked: 1,373 Times
Regardless of my personal opinion, seems a bit contrary to our right to be secure against unreasonable search. And that's all that really matters, isn't it?
__________________

Mathematically it makes about as much sense as
(pineapple)$$*cucumbe r*.


DannyV, REPLEKIA/. all say thanks to lawleypop for this post.
 
Old 11-25-2010 at 07:45 PM   #4
BenTran
Member
Posts: 43

Thanked: 5 Times
Liked: 3 Times
Its hard to say. In a way it acts like a deterrent for terrorist but I'm pretty sure they if the are determined to carry out a task, they will find alternative methods of doing so.

But if the TSA weren't working for the government then many of the things they are doing can be considered sexual assault. Eg. randomly strip searching those who do not want to get scanned, etc.. The government also said that photos of scanned people won't be saved in anyway. Also really hard to say because they can be easily saved through another method, eg. camera phone.

But flying today is getting to be a real hassle. Baggage restrictions, carry on restrictions, security searches, plus flight delays, cancellations, crappy food...
__________________
Ben Tran
Civil Engineering III

REPLEKIA/., ~*Sara*~ all say thanks to BenTran for this post.
 


Old 11-25-2010 at 07:46 PM   #5
Rakim
Account Locked
Posts: 1,832

Thanked: 87 Times
Liked: 814 Times
Oh no, people would see my washboard abs :(
 
Old 11-25-2010 at 07:50 PM   #6
REPLEKIA/.
Community Engagement Officer
Posts: 1,195

Thanked: 105 Times
Liked: 447 Times
Quote:
Originally Posted by xxsumz View Post
If it stops the terrorists, im all up for it.
The implementation of body scanners has indeed caught many more smuggled items, most of which are drugs. However, like any security system that relies on human interpretation, it's only as good as its operator. There are plenty of people on the internet who claim to have gotten past the body scanner with dangerous items. One notable such person is Mythbuster's Adam Savage who claims he made it past security inadvertently still carrying 2 12" steel razor blades in his jacket that he had been carrying around at work and forgotten about. ( skip to 1:04 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q3yaqq9Jjb4)

Also the number of 'TSA Horror Stories' surfacing is alarming. While the validity of these stories is in question, some of them are quite alarming. One example is of a mother whose child was taken for almost a half hour while she was strip searched after the baby's pacifier clip set off the metal detector. Another awful example is the following video(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5KdIa7KNkdQ), where a young boy has his shirt removed and a minor pat down administered in public
 
Old 11-25-2010 at 07:51 PM   #7
gOOCHTOPHER
Member
Posts: 77

Thanked: 4 Times
Liked: 11 Times
Quote:
Originally Posted by lawleypop View Post
Regardless of my personal opinion, seems a bit contrary to our right to be secure against unreasonable search. And that's all that really matters, isn't it?
disagree, very reasonable search if you want to get on an airplane with other people
dont be selfish or dont fly and enjoy other such services if you dont want to be searched this way
__________________
youtube.co m/watch?v=XEfmB9n5uCU
 
Old 11-25-2010 at 07:53 PM   #8
Afzal
Android Dev
Posts: 1,604

Thanked: 114 Times
Liked: 414 Times
if the TSA official is a female, I won't mind

I just hope airlines improve the food on board.
__________________
Afzal Najam - Honours Computer Science grad
 
Old 11-25-2010 at 07:54 PM   #9
REPLEKIA/.
Community Engagement Officer
Posts: 1,195

Thanked: 105 Times
Liked: 447 Times
Quote:
Originally Posted by Afzal View Post
if the TSA official is a female, I won't mind :p
The pat-downs are always provided by an official of the same gender. You are sadly, out of luck.
 
Old 11-25-2010 at 07:55 PM   #10
SilentWalker
∞/0? Only I know.
Posts: 598

Thanked: 35 Times
Liked: 202 Times
I have no problem with the equipment and procedures used by the TSA. After all, haven't we all been begging for better safety measures?

I have a problem with the employees.

With headlines like these: [1][2][3][4][5][6], it makes one wonder what ever happened to simple respect. You would think that in a recession where so many people would be so happy to get a job, the TSA would hire people other than these idiots.
 
Old 11-25-2010 at 07:56 PM   #11
BenTran
Member
Posts: 43

Thanked: 5 Times
Liked: 3 Times
"Don't Touch my Junk"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-UqM56e-kRA
__________________
Ben Tran
Civil Engineering III
 
Old 11-25-2010 at 07:56 PM   #12
JEFF_CHAN
Forum Creeper
Posts: 1,250

Thanked: 77 Times
Liked: 454 Times
__________________
Jeffrey Chan
Fifth-Year Commerce
Off-Campus

Afzal, BlakeM like this.
 
Old 11-25-2010 at 08:29 PM   #13
Kathy2
Elite Member
Posts: 2,112

Thanked: 159 Times
Liked: 529 Times
I will never go to an airport that uses full body scanners. If it means I never fly out of the country, so be it.
 
Old 11-25-2010 at 08:32 PM   #14
REPLEKIA/.
Community Engagement Officer
Posts: 1,195

Thanked: 105 Times
Liked: 447 Times
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kathy2 View Post
I will never go to an airport that uses full body scanners. If it means I never fly out of the country, so be it.
If it's not too much to ask, would you care to elaborate on why you feel that way? You obviously have a strong opinion on the matter, so I think the conversation would benefit from you explaining your point of view in greater detail.
 
Old 11-25-2010 at 08:34 PM   #15
lawleypop
I am Prince Vegeta.
Posts: 4,770

Thanked: 224 Times
Liked: 1,373 Times
Quote:
Originally Posted by gOOCHTOPHER View Post
disagree, very reasonable search if you want to get on an airplane with other people
dont be selfish or dont fly and enjoy other such services if you dont want to be searched this way
It's the same logic when I've been pulled over driving around at 3 am when I was 16. The only "valid" reason behind it is because "there have been a small amount of idiots in the past who ****ed things up for everyone else."

Not exactly a reasonable reason.

Still waiting for when all this nonsense gets applied to trains, etc and people will be "outraged" by that but not by this.


Maybe if it was 100% effective, then people's rights being infringed upon could be justified.
__________________

Mathematically it makes about as much sense as
(pineapple)$$*cucumbe r*.


Last edited by lawleypop : 11-25-2010 at 08:38 PM.
 



Article Tools Search this Article
Search this Article:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new articles
You may not post comments
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



McMaster University News and Information, Student-run Community, with topics ranging from Student Life, Advice, News, Events, and General Help.
Notice: The views and opinions expressed in this page are strictly those of the student(s) who authored the content. The contents of this page have not been reviewed or approved by McMaster University or the MSU (McMaster Students Union). Being a student-run community, all articles and discussion posts on MacInsiders are unofficial and it is therefore always recommended that you visit the official McMaster website for the most accurate up-to-date information.

Copyright © MacInsiders.com All Rights Reserved. No content can be re-used or re-published without permission. MacInsiders is a service of Fullerton Media Inc. | Created by Chad
Originally Powered by vBulletin®, Copyright © 2019 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved. | Privacy | Terms