Quote:
Originally Posted by feonateresa
It's true that I am only a statistic
|
It's a symptom of ALL large/publicly funded universities, and I don't think there's anything that can be done about it unfortunately.
Universities in places like Norway and Ireland where post-secondary education is 100% government subsidized are not considered to be the best quality insitutions worldwide... yes, the people get a postsecondary education, but the institutions themselves are considered "middle-of-the-pack". It's a consequence of public funding... there's never enough money to make things the best they can be. These institutions typically are very large, often on the order of 50,000 undergraduates.
It's not a coincidence that the top ranked universities in the world are all private universities. They have small, exclusive student populations and tuition can cost upwards of $20,000 per year. Harvard university, often ranked #1 in the world, has a undergraduate population of 6700 students, and 2400 faculty. That's a 3:1 student to faculty member ratio. Only the money that comes from a private institution can allow for this (and create the sense of community that subsequently creates a loyal + generous alumni).
PS: there are a few exceptions to this general rule, Oxford university being one example. Oxford is partially sibsidized by the British government, but it has a fantastic reputation partially because it's the oldest university in the western world. Oxford is consistently ranked in the top 10 universities in the world.