Science and Big Bang Theory
I will start off with this. The existence of God can be neither demonstrably proven or disproven. Rather one must have faith in a specific belief about God or in our case the existence of the world. However, I do think I can make the argument that it takes more faith to believe in the Big Bang than in a Creator.
Stephen Hawking, a very well known scientist, once wrote "Almost everyone now believes that the universe, and time itself, had a beginning at the Big Bang".
Another scientist, Francis Collins, put the Big Bang Theory in layman's terms writing
"We have this very solid conclusion that the universe had an origin, the Big Bang. Fifteen billion years ago, the universe began with an unimaginable bright flash of energy from an infinitesimally small point. That implies that before that, there was nothing. I can't imagine how nature, in this case the universe, could have created itself. And the very fact that the universe had a beginning implies that someone was able to begin it. And it seems to me that had to be outside of nature."
Everything we know in this world is "contingent" has a cause outside of itself. Therefore the universe, which is just a huge pile of such contingent entities, would itself have to be dependent on some cause outside of itself. Something had to make the Big Bang happen- but what? What could that be but something outside of nature, a supernatural, non contingent being that exists from itself.
This is just one of many reasons why I think an argument can be made that It takes more faith to believe in the Big Bang Theory than in a Creator.
Many of these reasons are outlined in a book called "The Reason for God". Please don't let the title scare you lol. It doesn't force a religion on you it simply outlines many logical ways of thinking about many of the tough questions that go along with religion.
If anyone is interested in reading the book I can lend it to you, just send me an email at
[email protected]
Hope that helps